Work With Me
AI workflow audits and implementation sprints, for teams that have outgrown the experimental phase.
I work with two or three founders and operators at a time on the unglamorous question: which manual workflow is costing you the most, and what would it take to actually fix it?
The output is one or two AI-assisted workflows your team can keep using — built, documented, handed off. Not another deck.
Engagement shapes
Two engagements per quarter. Currently booking June.
A good fit
Bluntly — when this works and when it doesn't.
The kind of work that actually ships.
Bounded, repeated, tied to a specific bottleneck. Below are four that have come up more than once. Yours probably looks like a cousin of one of them.
Research synthesis
Scattered notes, calls, and articles → structured briefs your team can actually reuse. Usually replaces the "let me put together a doc" tax that one person carries.
Product discovery
Customer feedback from support, sales, and interviews into a single repeatable review-and-prioritize workflow. The point isn't summarization — it's making the next decision faster.
Documentation & SOPs
Knowledge that lives in one person's head → operating docs the rest of the team can use. Most teams don't have a doc problem; they have an extraction problem.
Content operations
A lighter pipeline from rough ideas and notes to drafts, repurposing, and consistent publishing. Built for one person on the team, not a content factory.
How it goes
Three steps. The fit call is free; everything after is paid.
A 30-minute call to see if there's a real problem here.
You walk me through the workflow that feels most broken. I tell you whether the right next step is a paid audit, a sprint, or no engagement at all. The call is not free consulting — it's a triage.
If the problem's fuzzy, a paid audit. If it's clear, we go straight to building.
The audit ends with a written diagnosis and a concrete sprint plan, if one makes sense. The sprint is the implementation — one or two workflows built, prompted, integrated, tested against your actual inputs.
You're left with something that runs without me.
Documentation, prompt sets, tool configurations, and a 60-minute walkthrough with whoever on your team owns the workflow. I'm available for a month afterward for the small fixes that always come up.
I used to spend hours directing and editing our SEO person. SEOTakeoff just runs — I barely have to touch it. And the content is deeper and better optimized than what they were producing with generic AI tools like ChatGPT, at 20% of the cost.
FAQ
The questions I get on almost every fit call.
Founders, operators, and product or ops leads on small teams who've been experimenting with AI but haven't turned it into a reliable part of how the team operates.
Repeated workflows — research, documentation, synthesis, content, meeting capture, ops handoffs — that are still too manual, inconsistent, or dependent on one person.
I focus on diagnosis, implementation, documentation, and handoff in that order. The deliverable is a working system, not a deck. If you want vague advice from someone with a podcast, I can recommend other people.
Audits start at $1,500. Implementation sprints start at $2,500. Larger sprints are scoped against the work — I'll quote a fixed price after the fit call.
Yes, before the fit call if you'd like. I work with sensitive data regularly.
Tell me what's broken — I'll tell you if I can actually help.
Send a short note with the workflow that feels most painful, what you've already tried, and a sentence about your team. I respond inside two business days, usually the same day.
- Team size and your role
- The workflow you want to fix
- What's currently manual or inconsistent
- Tools you already use day-to-day
Start here
Email me directly.
graham@grahammann.net — the fastest path. I read everything.
Send Graham an emailOr reach out on LinkedIn. NDAs available on request.